During the past several weeks, we’ve
been exploring servant leadership, a leadership philosophy whose fundamental
basis is leaving a team or group better than you found them. This week, we will continue our deeper dive
into what servant leadership looks like by outlining two more key practices, as
defined by Kent M. Keith (2008) in The
Case of Servant Leadership. (See this post
for a discussion of the first two key practices.)
The third key practice is changing the pyramid. Robert Greenleaf founded servant leadership and he believed that the typical management
hierarchy – usually communicated as a pyramid – was detrimental to the leader
at the top of it. Over many years of
working at AT&T and consulting with other organizations, he came to
understand the effects of power, namely its tendency to corrupt. Some have called this “power poisoning” and it has been established in many studies. He noted that most leaders aren’t genuinely
questioned or even communicated with honestly, leading to information that is inaccurate
and an inflated belief in their own effectiveness. Greenleaf believed that the pyramid should be
expanded at the top to accommodate more peers in the leadership role, to
prevent the corrupting influence of isolation and “happy talk” from
subordinates. He believed that leaders
should function as a “first among equals” in order to obtain more honest
feedback and appropriate challenges to their ideas and functions. The leader’s role within this idea is to
listen, to set the vision and mission of the organization, then step back into
the group structure to facilitate solutions and ideas.
Keith (2008) notes the examples of
faculty governance in higher education – in which faculty elect one of their
own to head a department who then governs (typically) with a very light
hand. He also cites a company, The
Schneider Corporation, that has created a “Primus Council” based on this
servant leadership principle. This group
is composed of members from various parts of the company and “focuses on
strategic planning and vision, furthering the company’s culture, the growth and
development of the entire staff, and major organizational policies” (p.
41). The Schneider Corporation has seen
significant growth since adopting the servant leadership philosophy and
practices.
The fourth key practice is developing your colleagues. If you’ve read other parts of this series,
you’ve read the basic tenet of servant leadership, as outlined by Robert
Greenleaf: “The best test, and difficult
to administer is: do those served grow as persons? Do they, while
being served, become healthier, wiser, freer, more autonomous, more likely
themselves to become servants?” (2008, p. 15).
Greenleaf’s quote gets to the heart of this practice, which is about
whether you help your team improve and help them to become better people and
professionals. This practice does not
mean that you take your eye off the goals of your organization or that you
focus on improving your team to the exclusion of accomplishing things. It’s about understanding that the investment
you put into helping your team improve, whether it’s their ethics, their
skills, or their interpersonal functioning, pays huge dividends as those colleagues
improve their work and become more effective.
This has direct benefits to an organization in both the short- and
long-terms. A developmental approach
improves work on a day-to-day basis and also improves loyalty and cohesiveness,
which benefits the larger organization in the long-term.
What do you think about these leadership practices? What benefits to this approach do you have and what concerns you about it?
Cited:
Keith, K. M. (2008). The case for servant
leadership. Westfield, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant
Leadership.
Greenleaf, R. K. (2008). The servant as leader.
Westfield, IN: The Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.